Welcome to Serellan LLC

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

ORFJackal

Kickstarter
  • Content count

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

30 Good

About ORFJackal

  • Rank
    Corporal

Profile Information

  • Gender Not Telling
  • Location Finland
  • Gaming Platform PC
  1. I sent you a friend request. I can't promise when, but I'd like to play TD again some day. Do you have a link to your Steam group also? EDIT: Found your group: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/tdrsbuddies
  2. Excellent! TD had exceptionally good level designs, so it would be wonderful to be able to play those maps in Epsilon. I'm hoping that support for user-created maps will be added soon.
  3. I would prefer them to focus on first completing a minimal feature set that produces a viable game experience (i.e. MVP). I think for an FPS that would be PvP, because both Coop and SP require good enemy AI to be viable, and SP additionally requires good team AI and a good story. A viable PvP mode "only" requires good gameplay, but that's something that all the other modes need also, so it's possible to add Coop and SP modes later on without wasting any work that's done.
  4. What will be your release process? - Will there be early access and who can participate in it? - How early will the first early access version be released? (e.g. if you're not embarrased when releasing it, you've waited for too long) - How often will new early access versions be released? (e.g. weekly) - When will the 1.0 version be released? (e.g. "when it's done" / has features X, Y, Z) How will the project be financed?
  5. Which Wolfman? There are nearly 2000 with that name. Here is my Steam ID: http://steamcommunity.com/id/orfjackal Unfortunately I'm only on PC.
  6. Me too. Maybe somebody should should set a time and date for the true fans to play together, without annoying griefers.
  7. I voted for a new Tactical CQB FPS for PC. That's why I also kickstarted TD. I voted for multiplayer first, because I think that would be the fastest to implement well, but a good single player campaign would be excellent. With TD I liked co-op the most. With Rainbow Six 1-2 I liked the single player campaign the most. I chose Rainbow Six 1-3 because those I've played the most, but SWAT would also be interesting. I never played the SWAT games, but I think such a game would be a refreshing change from the typical kill-all-tangos tactical FPS. I care about Realistic Weapons Handling, AI and Mostly CQB Maps, or a nice blend of CQB and Open Maps. I think early access would give the most options for the community to affect how the game is developed. I like how Serellan is not giving up, but for the other options I can't vote for because there is still much room for improvement in the transparency/communication/community impact.
  8. Impressions from the video: Visual style good. Gameplay too generic. Needs something special to make it stand out from the crowd.
  9. Here's a summary for those who don't have time to watch it: In July 2012 the original angel investor went dark. Had to find new funding. In Fall 2012 signed a deal. In January 2013 started full development production, aimed for September 2013 release, XBLA concurrent release was part of the deal. Challenges: - Hiring solid engineers took longer than anticipated. (Due to being small team they had to be careful in hiring only top people.) - Were stuck with old version of Unreal engine and could not use newer Steam integration support, or else would have had to redo lots of audio content. - Originally had American and Indian QA teams, but in July 2013 the American team was dropped due to a dispute. Challenges with working the Indian team due to language, time difference, and the team was not experienced in testing multiplayer PC+Xbox games. - Scope of the game. In Spring it was clear that AI was sucking up a lot of time. And budget determines how much time can be used. In hindsight they should have cut away the singleplayer squad-based experience; it would have been better to have no experience than a sub-par experience. - The small game, small team message got lost. People expected Battlefield. For example had a ton more animations, but had an engineering bottleneck in getting them to the game. - Made the mistake of handing a community project like a retail product launch. Christian was occupied by too many things (e.g. different PR for the community and the press), too little time for development. - Added stress due to relatives dying and team members getting in accidents. With a 10 person team, losing 1 for a month is huge deal. - Mistake: Should have switched to early access model. QA team failed to find bugs and they were released to players, so had to focus on fixing bugs instead of adding features and working on DLC and Xbox. In early access mode the tone and tempo would have been totally different. - Mistake: Did not recognize Steam as its own community. Expected people to come to forums but they didn't, so people did not get proper answers and became unhappy. - Were inexperienced with Xbox development and Microsoft did not have proper support for indy developers back then. - Had challenges in making the game run outside Steam. In hindsight should have gone full Steam and worried about the DRM free version later, and offered to return money to those who demanded a DRM free version. - Post launch, couldn't get press to have a second look at the game. - In Spring, funding was running low. Started talking with another publisher, but they backed out. In April had to put the company on hold. Current situation: They have a prototype of a new game, on Unreal 3. Next steps are deciding what to they want to do in future. There are new platforms. Early access and indy development has had massive changes since Spring 2012. Christian will be at the forums.
  10. I too hope that you will continue making tactical shooters. The average player nowadays just doesn't have the patience for a true tactical game like TD. They just try to run and shoot through everything*. Just ignore their comments. Or better yet, design a game that teaches today's ADHD youths to be more patient (no idea how to do it, but make sure to do lots of usability testing with new players to see how they will play the game). * I just commented on a TD review where the player just did that and was frustrated because he always died in the HQ SP mission, outside insertion, in well under one minute. I gave him a link to one of our co-op gameplay videos to show the contrast. I support what Raptor and k3nny1550 said in their posts, so I'm not going to repeat them here. Just some main points for next time: Have an open alpha/beta testing phase (perhaps at a higher price, like Planetary Annihilation, to get early feedback from mostly just the true fans)Don't make an official release until "when it's done"Don't compromise the PC version because of console ports But here is one idea (thanks XJ13) for a new point of view for tactical shooters: Oculus Rift. For the next couple of years the whole industry will try to figure out how to make games for VR, so there will be lots of room for innovation. Currently we know that fast movement may cause nausea, so games like Team Fortress 2 and Quake don't port too well. But a tactical game where nobody runs or jumps might work. Though you would still need to figure out the controls for movement, turning and aiming; nothing is yet standardized for VR games. We could try including ideas from Door Kickers (thanks LordJulian). How about a tactical VR shooter where the movement is done on a tactical map (as a planning mode and/or during gameplay) and the player would only have the controls for moving forward/backward on the planned route, plus rotating in place and peeking around corners (using just Rift's 6DOF)? By restricting the ability to change your movement path in real time, it should reinforce the role of planning and using your brain. Such a game might even be controllable with just the head plus a couple of buttons (forward/backward/shoot/reload/etc.), without using a mouse (except for the planning mode, or if aiming with a mouse is better than with the head).
  11. I too would like to know that. I'm hoping that they will have a chance of creating Takedown 2 that would fix Takedown's problems.
  12. Maybe finally a game competition where I would have a chance of doing well. *wishin upon "129 hrs on record"*
  13. Good to know. But it would be best if the password option would be visible in the UI when hosting a game, so that everybody could know about it and would use it when they want a private time. Currently it's annoying when you try to join a game that the host wants to keep private, so then the host kicks or TK's you right after you get into the game (I found one such game host just moments ago).
  14. Excellent. Good settings for A&D would be 5 minute time limit and the winner of a match determined by 3 wins.